no. otherwise he would have turned purple irises into purple haze
and he would have turned caesar's gold into afghan gold.
update from an elder:.
you cannot be a witness if you grow pot.
they say the fed government on growing squashes state law or iniatives.
no. otherwise he would have turned purple irises into purple haze
and he would have turned caesar's gold into afghan gold.
update from an elder:.
you cannot be a witness if you grow pot.
they say the fed government on growing squashes state law or iniatives.
lol it's been a while since i've seen that show. i wouldn't survive a month like that hahaha
update from an elder:.
you cannot be a witness if you grow pot.
they say the fed government on growing squashes state law or iniatives.
i don't have any physical ailments. the mj has definitely helped me through depression.
edibles sounds perfect for you, i personally don't know anything about a "paste", but you can easily make cannabutter or oil to use in a wide variety of recipes.
plus, in my experience, the brownies, cookies, cakes, etc...last for hours depending on the amount in the butter or oil.
as far as reputable sites...
sent you a pm
update from an elder:.
you cannot be a witness if you grow pot.
they say the fed government on growing squashes state law or iniatives.
What's your view on indoor-hydroponics vs traditional Sun-light grown plants?
hydroponics without a doubt imo.
when done correctly, there's less variability, the plants ALWAYS have the nutrients they need. you can add carbon dioxide to help out the plants and the led lights coming out look interesting...
data-dog: where are you from?
hey tal :)
just by knowing what will happen, that doesn't mean that we can prevent or cause something to happen.
my knowing that does not prevent them the free will of making the choice.. it's the same with god.
if god is not restricted to existence in the present, then the future is known by god because god indwells the future as well as the present and the past.
what would be not accurate about that phrase?
the magazine sabado (saturday) launched yesterday (11/22/2012) an issue where the unknown world of jehovah's witnesses .
is revealed, and not for the bestreasons.
from the false prophecies, doctrinal inconsistencies, pedophilia and absurd prohibitions .
Oh yeah? Really?
I have also burned various things in trash cans - guess I'll pop up at the front page of some magazine.
yes really.
my mother tried multiple times to burn my books to force me to read the watchtower garbage.
and i'm from california.
cult comes in all kinds of flavors.
just by knowing what will happen, that doesn't mean that we can prevent or cause something to happen.
my knowing that does not prevent them the free will of making the choice.. it's the same with god.
if god is not restricted to existence in the present, then the future is known by god because god indwells the future as well as the present and the past.
Because 'guess' does not adequately describe it. Definition of guess is to predict without sufficient information.
Educated guess is a bit better. But I don't think that is entirely accurate as well.
'Know' comes closest of all of these. Knowing every action of everyone ever? Can't say as I think this is right.
why is educated guess not okay? what you've been saying sounds like a textbook definition of an educated guess.
or a very informed guess, but still a guess nonetheless.
http://www.thinkerthing.com/about-2/thought-puppet/.
i wanna be green lantern!
i wanna be green lantern!.
are you a jedi?
this is pretty much how i feel.......who disagrees with this?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yjo4duhmrzk&noredirect=1.
i've yet to see anyone pray to the god of organic chemistry.
while i am no fan of mother teresa after reading some of the revealed facts about her life and work - i thought this was just a little out of the realm of polite conversation (but was interesting):.
atheist group at dartmouth plans anti mother teresa event.. .
http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?id=4503.
good to speak about such things to hopefully prevent such mistakes in the future, at least as much as possible.
There are people who attack good deeds for not being done the way they think they should have been done.
that's rather dismissive.
your view is that it's an attack on good deeds. how do you know it was good deeds? someone else might legitimately claim these were not good deeds.
what constitutes "good intentions" in your view, might not be "good intentions" in someone else's view and vice versa.
why not prove her critics wrong with facts?